August 2011 – Tips & Topics

— Until Next Time

______________________________________________________

This month, the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) released a new definition of addiction. In the August 15, 2011 press release, a few of the “talking points” were highlighted:

• Addiction is a chronic brain disorder and not simply a behavioral problem involving too much alcohol, drugs, gambling or sex.
• This is the first time that ASAM has taken an official position that addiction is not solely related to problematic substance use.
• Outward behaviors are actually manifestations of an underlying disease that involves various areas of the brain.

In SAVVY this month, I will discuss some of implications of the new definition.

TIP 1
Addiction is primary disease, not just the result of emotional or psychiatric problems.

Addiction, at its core, is not just a social problem or a problem of morals. “Addiction is about brains. Not just about behaviors” (FAQ #3). A major thrust of the new definition is that it is not the substances a person uses that makes them an addict, nor is it even the quantity or frequency of use. It is about what happens in a person’s brain when they are exposed to rewarding substances or rewarding behaviors. These substances and behaviors “turn on” the reward circuitry in the brain and related brain structures. (FAQ #1).

In the Reference list below, you can find links where you can read a longer definition of addiction. Reference Number 4 will take you to all the Frequently Asked Questions.
Here is the short version definition.

Short Definition of Addiction:
Addiction is a primary, chronic disease of brain reward, motivation, memory and related circuitry. Dysfunction in these circuits leads to characteristic biological, psychological, social and spiritual manifestations. This is reflected in an individual pathologically pursuing reward and/or relief by substance use and other behaviors.
Addiction is characterized by inability to consistently abstain, impairment in behavioral control, craving, diminished recognition of significant problems with one’s behaviors and interpersonal relationships, and a dysfunctional emotional response. Like other chronic diseases, addiction often involves cycles of relapse and remission. Without treatment or engagement in recovery activities, addiction is progressive and can result in disability or premature death.

TIP 2
Check to see if you still harbor these common and counterproductive attitudes and beliefs about addiction and about those afflicted and affected by addiction.

1. If you just look at the behavior of a person with addiction, you may see a person who lies, cheats, breaks laws and appears to lack good moral values.

• The counterproductive reaction of society is to punish such antisocial behaviors and approach a person with addiction as “a bad person” to be punished.

• The productive attitude to have is to “realize that good people can do very bad things, and the behaviors of addiction are understandable in the context of the alterations in brain function.” (FAQ #3)

2. So if you say a person has the disease of addiction, are they not still responsible for their behaviors? Or in other words are you letting them off the hook by saying they have a disease?

• The counterproductive reaction to understanding addiction as a primary disease is for a person with addiction to say, “Don’t blame me, it was my disease that made me go into the bar and relapse.” They may not be as blatant as that, but even addiction treatment professionals are ambivalent about how to balance responsibility for relapses with addiction as a relapsing disease (See SKILLS below).

• The productive attitude to have is to recognize “personal responsibility is important in all aspects of life, including how a person maintains their own health…..You are not responsible for your disease, but you are responsible for your recovery.” Just as people with diabetes and heart disease need to take personal responsibility for how they manage their illness, those with addiction need to do the same. (FAQ #4)

3. If healthcare professionals, facilities and insurance benefits packages only focus on the substance use and related complications, the underlying addiction illness is not treated. As a result, people with addiction keep presenting with complications and can switch in search of other rewarding substances and/or addictive behaviors.

• The counterproductive result of focusing just on the substance use and associated complications is this: Physicians and other healthcare professionals think their work is done when they manage withdrawal symptoms and detox a person, or stabilize someone’s substance-induced psychosis, or fix a broken leg from injuries in a drunk driving accident. Insurance benefits may cover only detoxification in a medical facility, as if addiction is an acute illness needing just stabilization of the substance use, rather than ongoing treatment like other chronic diseases.

• The productive attitude to have is this: To see the need for comprehensive addiction treatment of the “underlying disease process in the brain that has biological, psychological, social and spiritual manifestations.” (FAQ #8)

References

______________________________________________________

TIP

Check if you, your treatment team or your community really embraces addiction as a primary disease.

Here’s what it would mean to clinical skills, healthcare and criminal justice systems’ change, funding and managed care organizations:

___________________________________________________

______________________________________________________

Here is a comment on the Stump the Shrink question last month about a father wanting advice on how to help his daughter suffering from addiction and my response to their comments.

Comment #1

“Tough love and detach…..sure, that is the staid wisdom. But, without financial resources, the tough love won’t help her get into treatment. I’ve met with a prior client who is now very bitter because of past debt of well-meaning treatment efforts. These bills go to collection. Now, although she may need assistance again, she is so bitter about the financial mess she will not benefit from treatment–only resent it. She is not an isolated instance.”

My response

Thanks for your comments.  You make some good points. Without good health insurance or universal healthcare (or independent wealth that can afford to pay out of pocket), people can’t afford the care they need for addiction treatment and every other acute and chronic illness.  The bitterness your client and many other patients feel can be re-told over and over – for huge bills when receiving care in emergency rooms; procedures for surgical, cancer, heart and lung conditions, hip replacements…. and the list goes on. Until this country figures out how to commit to universal healthcare, there are over 50 million people without healthcare coverage and many others with inadequate insurance. So your client is not alone.

What I would say about addiction clients and their bitterness about treatment costs is the following:

1. That treatment facilities ought to be flexible and individualized in their approach with clients- to collaborate with them on which treatment is best for the client’s outcomes and finances etc.  Too often addiction programs plug people into pre-determined programs and fixed lengths of stay.  Clients do not feel empowered to question the treatment recommendations and make an informed decision which takes into account their cultural, financial preferences and goals.

2. Increasingly addiction treatment programs will need to look at “value” (i.e. cost of services + quality and outcomes). What does “value” look like for a person who relapses? It looks like an arrangement where it can be worked out so services for the person can be continued, without subjecting him to an unnecessary ‘re-entering’ a program as if he was a brand new client.

3. Addiction clients may be bitter at the costs of care. However as they recover, hopefully they will see that financial loss (along with all the other losses) is all part of the devastating illness of addiction.   In retrospect, we hope they will remember all the times they have probably spent equal (if not more) resources on getting drugs, and repairing the costs of this to their family.  Let’s hope they start to acknowledge the financial costs due to their illness, the employment income lost from job problems due to addiction, the legal costs they’ve incurred etc.  Keeping this context in mind, if the individual can arrest those human and financial costs by entering treatment and recovery, they will make up the financial costs of treatment by arresting their addiction. They will also gain back much of what they have lost socially, physically, spiritually and financially if they keep active in recovery.

When viewed from that perspective, the investment in treatment will bring a far greater return on those financial resources than the return on investment in the years and dollars spent on addiction.

David

Comment #2

“Hello, Dr. Mee-Lee.

I am the mother of a 35-year-old son with bipolar disorder and meth addiction.

I was especially interested in your last newsletter.  I run a NAMI (National Alliance on Mental Illness) support group for families with a loved one with co-occurring disorders, and the letter that you responded to could have been one that any of us could have written during our journey.  There were two specifics that I wanted to address.

While talking about Amy Winehouse you talked about her family’s need for education.  What we have determined in our public behavioral health system is that unless your family member is actively involved with a treatment provider, you are not eligible for education and/or support.  Hence why we went to NAMI to see if we could get support.  I find that often the family is blamed for “enabling” their loved one when in reality, they are unsure what to do and have little availability for assistance.  Also, in my experience, I’ve found many families that found the stigma of substance use even more threatening than mental illness, and would not accept that the substance use was anything more than a person “self medicating” and therefore the result of a disorder rather than a disorder itself.  So, just as a client may be pre-contemplative, so are many family members!

You also spoke about interventions and I currently am not well-versed in this process.  Is there a reference that you can provide me to allow me to research this more?

I forward your email to my support group members every month and it often leads us to discussion.  I appreciate the information you provide.  I only wish the information you do share was more evident in our system of care.  Thanks again.”

My response

Thanks for taking the time to write and you raise some important points about blaming families and how to help families.  As regards to Intervention in addiction treatment (and other process addictions), if you go to Google and type in “Intervention in addiction” you will get more information that will help.  If not, let me know.

David

______________________________________________________

Thanks for joining us this month. See you in late September.

David